On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Christopher Hall <christopher.s.h...@intel.com> wrote: > I just sent another patchset (v8). I corrected the comment problems pointed > out by Richard Cochran. I also changed the arch/x86 code to use "non-stop" > TSC rather than "invariant" TSC. They are *exactly* the same thing (i.e. > read from the same bit of the CPUID leaf). The former exists already and > should be used instead. Patch 6/8 is the only patch that is changed apart > from comments.
Ok. So I see you addressed some of Andy's feedback, but did you answer the bit about the k offset? thanks -john
