Sorry, folks. I was confused. The patch looked familiar, but I wasn't able to find the email where I originally sent it out.
-----Original Message----- From: Kirsher, Jeffrey T Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 11:49 AM To: David Miller; Underwood, JohnX Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; nhor...@redhat.com; sassm...@redhat.com; jogre...@redhat.com Subject: Re: [net-next 10/16] i40e: add check for null VSI On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 14:41 -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: "Underwood, JohnX" <johnx.underw...@intel.com> > Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:15:53 +0000 > > > ACK > > You should never top-post on this mailing list. > > But in this specific case it is even more important. > > So just in case it is not clear: > > Please, pretty please, DO NOT top-post ACKs to patches like > this. > > It looks like a new, fresh, patch submission to patchwork therefore > you are creating a significant burdon for me. Not to mention he was ACK'ing his own patch that he authored. :-( Sorry Dave, I will work with him offline.
