On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 01:09:47PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 15:21 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > index 289c231..7973ab5 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ struct net_device_stats {
> >     unsigned long   tx_window_errors;
> >     unsigned long   rx_compressed;
> >     unsigned long   tx_compressed;
> > +   unsigned long   rx_unhandled;
> >  };
> >  
> 
> This structure is deprecated, please do not add new fields in it,
> as it will increase netlink answers for no good reason.
> 
> rtnl_link_stats64 is what really matters these days.

I'll respin the set without that, along with s/unhandled/nohandler/, which
I somehow got screwed up in my head and realized a split second after
hitting send. Outside of that, does this approach look sane? Should I
bother with touching /proc/net/dev output or not?

Thanks much,

-- 
Jarod Wilson
ja...@redhat.com

Reply via email to