+devicet...@vger.kernel.org instead.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Olof Johansson <o...@lixom.net> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> wrote: >>> I hate to bikeshed, but I'm not sure if "generic-mdio" is too... >>> generic? Will someone writing a DT be thinking "well, this is a >>> generic mdio PHY, I should set it"? "mdio-device"? >>> "generic-nonphy-mdio"? Neither of those seem much better. >> >> How about 'not-a-phy'? > > "mdio,not-a-phy" or "mdio,non-phy" will scope it a bit, especially if > you expect other generic mdio properties that can do with a namespace. > > Probably time to add devicetree-discuss. Doing so. > > > -Olof
