> The fact what include/linux/license.h:license_is_gpl_compatible includes > "Dual MIT/GPL" as an option seems to suggest that it is enough of a thing > to be validly used as the contents of a MODULE_LICENSE() thing.
Yes. The MIT licence most definitely exists, and people know what it means. Also nobody should be changing the licence on anything unless they have the written permission of all rights holders on record, so it's best to leave it be 8) Alan
