On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:50:46PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
...
> +void sctp_hash_transport(struct sctp_transport *t)
> +{
> + struct sctp_sockaddr_entry *addr;
> + struct sctp_hash_cmp_arg arg;
> +
> + addr = list_entry(t->asoc->base.bind_addr.address_list.next,
> + struct sctp_sockaddr_entry, list);
> + arg.laddr = &addr->a;
> + arg.paddr = &t->ipaddr;
> + arg.net = sock_net(t->asoc->base.sk);
> +
> +reinsert:
> + if (rhashtable_lookup_insert_key(&sctp_transport_hashtable, &arg,
> + &t->node, sctp_hash_params) == -EBUSY)
> + goto reinsert;
> +}
This is the nasty situation I mentioned in previous email. It seems that
a stress test can trigger a double rehash and cause an entry to not be
added.
This is in fact very near some bugs you caught on rhashtable in the past
few days/couple of weeks tops.
I'm actually against this loop as is. I may have not been clear with Xin
about not adding my signature to the patchset due to this.
Please take a look at Xin's emails on thread 'rhashtable: Prevent
spurious EBUSY errors on insertion' about this particular situation.
Cc'ing Herbert as he wanted to see the patches for that issue.
Marcelo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
