Le 25/12/2015 16:27, Martin Blumenstingl a écrit : > at803x currently automatically enables the RGMII TX clock delay when the > phy interface mode is PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID. The same should be > done when PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID is specified. > Use a similar logic to enable the RGMII RX clock delay as well. > at803x_context_{save,restore} were not touched because these are only > used on AR8030 which is a RMII phy (RGMII clock delays are irrelevant).
Few nits below > > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumensti...@googlemail.com> > --- > drivers/net/phy/at803x.c | 78 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/at803x.c b/drivers/net/phy/at803x.c > index f566b6e..0b262a2 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/phy/at803x.c > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/at803x.c > @@ -36,8 +36,10 @@ > #define AT803X_INSR 0x0013 > #define AT803X_DEBUG_ADDR 0x1D > #define AT803X_DEBUG_DATA 0x1E > -#define AT803X_DEBUG_SYSTEM_MODE_CTRL 0x05 > -#define AT803X_DEBUG_RGMII_TX_CLK_DLY BIT(8) > +#define AT803X_DEBUG_REG_0 0x00 Seems like the previous register name might have been clearer that the new name you suggest here, did that come from a different GPL tarball or documentation? > +#define AT803X_DEBUG_RX_CLK_DLY_EN BIT(15) > +#define AT803X_DEBUG_REG_5 0x05 > +#define AT803X_DEBUG_TX_CLK_DLY_EN BIT(8) > > #define ATH8030_PHY_ID 0x004dd076 > #define ATH8031_PHY_ID 0x004dd074 > @@ -61,6 +63,61 @@ struct at803x_context { > u16 led_control; > }; > > +static int _at803x_debug_reg_read(struct phy_device *phydev, u16 reg) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ret = phy_write(phydev, AT803X_DEBUG_ADDR, reg); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + return phy_read(phydev, AT803X_DEBUG_DATA); > +} > + > +static int at803x_debug_reg_mask(struct phy_device *phydev, u16 reg, > + u16 clear, u16 set) > +{ > + u16 val; > + int ret; > + > + mutex_lock(&phydev->lock); I do not think the mutex is required here, did you encounter a case where the PHY state machine was improperly calling into these? > + > + ret = _at803x_debug_reg_read(phydev, reg); > + if (ret < 0) > + goto out; > + > + val = ret & 0xffff; > + val &= ~clear; > + val |= set; > + > + ret = phy_write(phydev, AT803X_DEBUG_DATA, val); > + > +out: > + mutex_unlock(&phydev->lock); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int at803x_set_rx_delay(struct phy_device *phydev, bool enable) > +{ > + if (enable) > + return at803x_debug_reg_mask(phydev, AT803X_DEBUG_REG_0, 0, > + AT803X_DEBUG_RX_CLK_DLY_EN); > + else > + return at803x_debug_reg_mask(phydev, AT803X_DEBUG_REG_0, > + AT803X_DEBUG_RX_CLK_DLY_EN, 0); The enable argument is always true right now, are we potentially missing an initialization to false for the non-delay case (RGMII and RGMII_TXID cases)? > +} > + > +static int at803x_set_tx_delay(struct phy_device *phydev, bool enable) > +{ > + if (enable) > + return at803x_debug_reg_mask(phydev, AT803X_DEBUG_REG_5, 0, > + AT803X_DEBUG_TX_CLK_DLY_EN); > + else > + return at803x_debug_reg_mask(phydev, AT803X_DEBUG_REG_5, > + AT803X_DEBUG_TX_CLK_DLY_EN, 0); > +} Same here > + > /* save relevant PHY registers to private copy */ > static void at803x_context_save(struct phy_device *phydev, > struct at803x_context *context) > @@ -217,14 +274,17 @@ static int at803x_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev) > if (ret < 0) > return ret; > > - if (phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID) { > - ret = phy_write(phydev, AT803X_DEBUG_ADDR, > - AT803X_DEBUG_SYSTEM_MODE_CTRL); > - if (ret) > + if (phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID || > + phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID) { > + ret = at803x_set_rx_delay(phydev, true); > + if (ret < 0) > return ret; > - ret = phy_write(phydev, AT803X_DEBUG_DATA, > - AT803X_DEBUG_RGMII_TX_CLK_DLY); > - if (ret) > + } > + > + if (phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID || > + phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID) { > + ret = at803x_set_tx_delay(phydev, true); > + if (ret < 0) > return ret; > } > > -- Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html