Hi Marc, On 22.12.2015 22:28, Marc Haber wrote: > Hi Hannes, > > thanks for your mail. > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 04:15:14PM +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: >> On 12.12.2015 20:58, Marc Haber wrote: >>> Any hints would be appreciated. >> >> This sysctl should help: >> >> accept_ra_from_local - BOOLEAN >> Accept RA with source-address that is found on local machine >> if the RA is otherwise proper and able to be accepted. >> Default is to NOT accept these as it may be an un-intended >> network loop. >> >> Functional default: >> enabled if accept_ra_from_local is enabled >> on a specific interface. >> disabled if accept_ra_from_local is disabled >> on a specific interface. >> >> Anyway, this has to be fixed up in a clean way and should work by default. > > The clean way would be: > > accept_ra_from_local=0: never accept RA with source-address that is > found on local machine > accept_ra_from_local=1: always accept RA with source-address that is > found on local machine. Dangerous. > accept_ra_from_local=2: only accept RA with link local source-address > that is found on local machine, and not if received RA points to an > address that is locally configured on the same interface. Default. > > Shall I file a bug for this in bugzilla?
Thanks but no need to do that, I already cooked a patch and will submit tomorrow after some testing. We don't need to enhance the sysctl, default should be to simply check the interface too if a route with link-local address is received. Bye, Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html