Am 08.12.2015 um 23:16 schrieb One Thousand Gnomes: > The right fix as far as I can see is to remove the tests although > WARN_ON() combined with your tty->ops change might be safer.
Feel free to submit a patch.
>> It's pretty obvious that this should have been part of commit
>> f34d7a5b7010 ("tty: The big operations rework"). That being said, these
>
> It ahould probably have been fixed around the same time or in one of the
> tty locking reviews, but drivers/isdn and net/irda weren't traditionally
> part of the general tty maintenance but handled separately/
Or just ignored.
>> test puzzle me. It's not obvious why they're needed. Ie, can the null
>> dereferences they try to catch really happen? But I can try to figure
>> out that in the future, if I ever feel the urge to do so. Anyhow:
>>
>> Acked-by: Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl>
>
> Nacked-by: Alan Cox <a...@linux.intel.com>
So you feel it's better to maintain the current inconsistent state
created by commit f34d7a5b? Please elaborate.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
