On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 19:45 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> With this patch each CPU is associated with its own set of TX queues. In
> the same time the SKB received in mvneta_tx is bound to the queue
> associated to the CPU sending the data. Thanks to this the next IRQ will
> be received on the same CPU allowing sending more data.
>
> It will also allow to have a more predictable behavior regarding
> throughput and latency when having multiple threads sending out data on
> different CPUs.
>
> As an example on Armada XP GP, with an iperf bound to a CPU and a ping
> bound to another CPU, without this patch the ping round trip was about
> 2.5ms (and could reach 3s!), whereas with this patch it was around
> 0.7ms (and sometime it went to 1.2ms).
This really looks like you need something smarter than pfifo_fast qdisc,
and maybe BQL (I did not check if this driver already implements this)
>
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clem...@free-electrons.com>
...
> @@ -1824,13 +1835,16 @@ error:
> static int mvneta_tx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> {
> struct mvneta_port *pp = netdev_priv(dev);
> - u16 txq_id = skb_get_queue_mapping(skb);
> + u16 txq_id = smp_processor_id() % txq_number;
> struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq = &pp->txqs[txq_id];
> struct mvneta_tx_desc *tx_desc;
> int len = skb->len;
> int frags = 0;
> u32 tx_cmd;
>
> + /* Use the tx queue bound to this CPU */
> + skb_set_queue_mapping(skb, txq_id);
> +
We certainly do not want every driver implementing its own hacks.
We have a standard way to handle this, it is called XPS, and eventually
ndo_select_queue()
Documentation/networking/scaling.txt contains some hints.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
