On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 09:42:08PM +0100, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 04:03:37PM +0100, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> > Yes, it most likely was introduced by 287f3a943fef ("pppoe: Use
> > workqueue to die properly when a PADT is received"). I still have to
> > figure out why.
> 
> I confirm the bug comes from this commit.
> 
> It happens if pppoe_connect() reinitialises po->proto.pppoe.padt_work
> after pppoe_disc_rcv() has added it to the system's work queue, and
> before that work got scheduled. Then when scheduling occurs, the worker
> thread tries to run a corrupted structure and crashes.
> 
> I'm going to work on a patch.

You can try the following. It's not yet a proper fix as there are still
a few things that bug me in pppoe_connect().

---
diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c b/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
index 5e0b432..865b74d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
@@ -568,6 +568,9 @@ static int pppoe_create(struct net *net, struct socket 
*sock, int kern)
        sk->sk_family           = PF_PPPOX;
        sk->sk_protocol         = PX_PROTO_OE;
 
+       INIT_WORK(&pppox_sk(sk)->proto.pppoe.padt_work,
+                 pppoe_unbind_sock_work);
+
        return 0;
 }
 
@@ -632,8 +635,6 @@ static int pppoe_connect(struct socket *sock, struct 
sockaddr *uservaddr,
 
        lock_sock(sk);
 
-       INIT_WORK(&po->proto.pppoe.padt_work, pppoe_unbind_sock_work);
-
        error = -EINVAL;
        if (sp->sa_protocol != PX_PROTO_OE)
                goto end;
@@ -663,8 +664,6 @@ static int pppoe_connect(struct socket *sock, struct 
sockaddr *uservaddr,
                        po->pppoe_dev = NULL;
                }
 
-               memset(sk_pppox(po) + 1, 0,
-                      sizeof(struct pppox_sock) - sizeof(struct sock));
                sk->sk_state = PPPOX_NONE;
        }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to