On Tuesday, November 03, 2015 at 05:56:53 PM, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Aleksander Morgado > > <aleksan...@aleksander.es> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > >>> , or the duplex TX/RX setup for channels > >>> (channels are either RX or TX, not both), or the local > >>> echoing/loopback (which wouldn't make much sense for TX-only > >>> channels). > >> > >> Aren't the RX-only/TX-only channels rather a special case ? > > > > They're actually the only case AFAIK. You've got systems generating > > streams of ARINC429 words (e.g. the IRS, the FMC...) and systems that > > may consume the streams from multiple independent channels (e.g. the > > IFE). I try to think of each logical bus as a single transmitter > > broadcasting to multiple receivers. > > I've re-checked the spec and it does say that there may be systems > that act as source (TX) and sink (RX), e.g. DME, VOR or ILS. But in > those cases, they will actually have separate TX and RX physical > ports.
So, considering that hi3593 which as 2x RX and 1x TX port, what about registering one device per port and be done with it ? Best regards, Marek Vasut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
