On 10/29/2015 03:00 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 02:23:25PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>
>> +            netif_carrier_off(ds->ports[port]);
>>              unregister_netdev(ds->ports[port]);
>> +            phy_disconnect(p->phy);
>>              free_netdev(ds->ports[port]);
>>      }
> 
> Once you make it actually compile....
> 
> I'm not sure this is safe. The loop above this one has just destroyed
> some phys, and now you are potentially disconnecting a phy you just
> destroyed, causing it to be accessed?
> 
> I would suggest you first fix the ordering in dsa_switch_destroy()
> and then add the missing netif_carrier_off() and phy_disconnect().
> 
> Thanks
>       Andrew
> 

Yes, you are right, I will submit a cleaned up version.
I forgot the fixed phy case actually.

Thanks,
Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to