On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 06:31:04PM +0800, xiakaixu wrote:
> The RFC patch set contains the necessary commit log [1].
That's of course the wrong place, this should be in the patch's
Changelog. It doesn't become less relevant.
> In some scenarios we don't want to output trace data when perf sampling
> in order to reduce overhead. For example, perf can be run as daemon to
> dump trace data when necessary, such as the system performance goes down.
> Just like the example given in the cover letter, we only receive the
> samples within sys_write() syscall.
>
> The helper bpf_perf_event_control() in this patch set can control the
> data output process and get the samples we are most interested in.
> The cpu_function_call is probably too much to do from bpf program, so
> I choose current design that like 'soft_disable'.
So, IIRC, we already require eBPF perf events to be CPU-local, which
obviates the entire need for IPIs.
So calling pmu->stop() seems entirely possible (its even NMI safe).
This, however, does not explain if you need nesting, your patch seemed
to have a counter, which suggest you do.
In any case, you could add perf_event_{stop,start}_local() to mirror the
existing perf_event_read_local(), no? That would stop the entire thing
and reduce even more overhead than simply skipping the overflow handler.
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/12/135
Blergh, vger should auto drop emails with lkml.org links in, that site
is getting ridiculously unreliable. (It did show the email after a
second try -- this time)
Proper links are of the form:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/$MSGID
Those have the bonus of actually including the msgid which helps with
finding the email in local archives/mailers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
