On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:14 PM, David Ahern <d...@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: > On 10/16/15 10:12 AM, Jan Blunck wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:02 PM, David Ahern <d...@cumulusnetworks.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 10/16/15 9:57 AM, Jan Blunck wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I don't think that enslaved ports should get network layer addresses. >>>> This is one example with a team device: >>> >>> >>> >>> for VRF devices we do want the enslaved links to have link local >>> addresses. >>> >> >> That is interesting. As far I can see you are setting IFF_SLAVE in >> do_vrf_add_slave() and therefore already stop IPv6 addrconf. >> > > Check net-next. That had to be removed to get IPv6 working. >
Thanks for the pointer. So it would be better to differentiate between L2 and L3 ports and only start addrconf on later ones? I don't think there is a flag that allows for that though. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
