Hi, On Fri, Oct 16, 2015, at 10:08, Jiri Benc wrote: > On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 01:08:26 -0700 (PDT), David Miller wrote: > > I think his point is that you'll be making changes to an RFC specified > > protocol. > > The RFC is only informational, it has never became an Internet > standard (under the RFC terms). And no other OS picked it up. Keeping > kernel uAPI documentation in IETF database sounds rather inefficient.
I would suggest you simply add a description to the rfc via the errata process here: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_report.php> The original cover letter should be enough to post there. I am also not sure if people do really implement this spec, at least they have a pointer to it, then. AFAIK the IESG will look into that then and even non-approved erratas will be listed on the rfc page. Bye, Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
