> On Oct 10, 2015, at 2:30 AM, Vivien Didelot
> <vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
>
> I have two concerns in mind:
>
> a) if we imagine that drivers like Rocker allocate memory in the prepare
> phase for each VID, preparing a range like 100-4000 would definitely not
> be recommended.
>
> b) imagine that you have two Linux bridges on a switch, one using the
> hardware VLAN 100. If you request the VLAN range 99-101 for the other
> bridge members, it is not possible for the driver to say "I can
> accelerate VLAN 99 and 101, but not 100". It must return OPNOTSUPP for
> the whole range.
Another concern I have with vid_being..vid_end range is the “flags”. Where
flags can be BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_PVID.
There is no sense having more than one VLAN as a PVID.
This leave the HW vendor the choice which VLAN id they will use as the PVID.
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+���z�^�)����w* jg��� �����ݢj/���z�ޖ��2�ޙ����&�)ߡ�a���� �G���h��j:+v���w��٥
