On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: > Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 10:28:58AM CEST, j...@resnulli.us wrote: >>Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 08:45:58AM CEST, gerlitz...@gmail.com wrote: >>>On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote:
>>>This introduced a regression to the 2-phase commit scheme, since the >>>prepare commit can fail >>>and that would go un-noticed toward the upper layer, agree? >>Well, no. This still does the transaction for all lower devices in one >>go. No change in that. > Now I get it, yes you are right. But currently there is no code in > kernel which would control retval of deferred attr_set or obj_add/del I am not sure to understand your reply. You are saying that when the deferred procedures complete (e.g fail in the prepare phase) they can't actually let the upper layer to realize that this change isn't possible? this is exactly the bug. Or. Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
