Hi Tycho, [auto build test results on v4.3-rc3 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore]
config: i386-alldefconfig (attached as .config)
reproduce:
git checkout 9613ae6bf5f111701614acb3eda3123d21a59239
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> kernel/seccomp.c:998:10: error: expected ';', ',' or ')' before 'const'
const char __user *filter)
^
kernel/seccomp.c: In function 'do_seccomp':
>> kernel/seccomp.c:1016:10: error: implicit declaration of function
>> 'seccomp_filter_fd' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
return seccomp_filter_fd(flags, uargs);
^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +998 kernel/seccomp.c
992 const char __user *filter)
993 {
994 return -EINVAL;
995 }
996
997 static inline long seccomp_filter_fd(unsigned int flags
> 998 const char __user *filter)
999 {
1000 return -EINVAL;
1001 }
1002 #endif
1003
1004 /* Common entry point for both prctl and syscall. */
1005 static long do_seccomp(unsigned int op, unsigned int flags,
1006 const char __user *uargs)
1007 {
1008 switch (op) {
1009 case SECCOMP_SET_MODE_STRICT:
1010 if (flags != 0 || uargs != NULL)
1011 return -EINVAL;
1012 return seccomp_set_mode_strict();
1013 case SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER:
1014 return seccomp_set_mode_filter(flags, uargs);
1015 case SECCOMP_FILTER_FD:
> 1016 return seccomp_filter_fd(flags, uargs);
1017 default:
1018 return -EINVAL;
1019 }
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
.config.gz
Description: Binary data
