On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Thomas F Herbert <thomasfherb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Pravin, > > Another comment and question. Please seen inline below. > > Thanks, > > --Tom > > On 9/24/15 7:42 PM, Pravin Shelar wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Thomas F Herbert >> <thomasfherb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Add support for 802.1ad including the ability to push and pop double >>> tagged vlans. Add support for 802.1ad to netlink parsing and flow >>> conversion. Uses double nested encap attributes to represent double >>> tagged vlan. Inner TPID encoded along with ctci in nested attributes. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas F Herbert <thomasfherb...@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> net/openvswitch/flow.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++---- >>> net/openvswitch/flow.h | 5 ++ >>> net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c | 166 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >>> 3 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) >>> ...
>>> @@ -1320,6 +1437,7 @@ static int __ovs_nla_put_key(const struct >>> sw_flow_key *swkey, >>> { >>> struct ovs_key_ethernet *eth_key; >>> struct nlattr *nla, *encap; >>> + struct nlattr *in_encap = NULL; >>> >>> if (nla_put_u32(skb, OVS_KEY_ATTR_RECIRC_ID, output->recirc_id)) >>> goto nla_put_failure; >>> @@ -1368,17 +1486,42 @@ static int __ovs_nla_put_key(const struct >>> sw_flow_key *swkey, >>> ether_addr_copy(eth_key->eth_src, output->eth.src); >>> ether_addr_copy(eth_key->eth_dst, output->eth.dst); >>> >>> - if (swkey->eth.tci || swkey->eth.type == htons(ETH_P_8021Q)) { >>> + if (swkey->eth.tci || eth_type_vlan(swkey->eth.type)) { >>> __be16 eth_type; >>> - eth_type = !is_mask ? htons(ETH_P_8021Q) : htons(0xffff); >>> + >>> + if (swkey->eth.cvlan.ctci || >>> + eth_type_vlan(swkey->eth.cvlan.c_tpid)) >>> + eth_type = !is_mask ? htons(ETH_P_8021AD) : >>> + htons(0xffff); >>> + else >>> + eth_type = !is_mask ? htons(ETH_P_8021Q) : >>> + htons(0xffff); >>> + >> >> Here we can directly dump output->eth.type to netlink. No need to >> check for inner encap. > > The eth.type is set to the inner encapsulated protocol not to the tpid. We > don't "know" what the outer tpid so I assume it is 802.1Q. To address this > situation, do you think I should add the outer tpid to sw_flow_key? > Also see comment above in flow.h. > With the addition of nested vlan, we need to add outer tpid. This will simplify vlan netlink serialization too. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html