On 07.09.2015 10:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Sep 7 09:13, poma wrote:
>> On 06.09.2015 12:19, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Sep 4 22:59, Francois Romieu wrote:
>>>> Applies against davem's net as of
>>>> f1ccbfce2fc787981d1182d09c1f6b67766783a8.
>>>>
>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
>>>> index 24dcbe6..56829ea 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
>>>> @@ -2200,7 +2200,7 @@ static struct rtl8169_counters
>>>> *rtl8169_map_counters(struct net_device *dev,
>>>> struct rtl8169_counters *counters;
>>>> u32 cmd;
>>>>
>>>> - counters = dma_alloc_coherent(d, sizeof(*counters), paddr, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + counters = dma_alloc_coherent(d, sizeof(*counters), paddr, GFP_ATOMIC);
>>>> if (counters) {
>>>> RTL_W32(CounterAddrHigh, (u64)*paddr >> 32);
>>>> cmd = (u64)*paddr & DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
>>>> --
>>>> 2.4.3
>>> [...]
>> 1. Reverted to r8169.c?id=eb78139
>> - the noise is still present
>> 2. Patches applied - Francois Romieu (3):
>> r8169: decouple the counters data and the device private area.
>> r8169: move rtl_reset_counters_cond before the hardware counters helpers.
>> r8169: increase the lifespan of the hardware counters dump area.
>> - the noise is still present
>
> Sure you tested the right code? I'm just asking because...
>
>> [ 70.016445] [<ffffffff81847841>] dump_stack+0x4b/0x63
>> [ 70.016456] [<ffffffff811008c7>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xd7/0x110
>> [ 70.016465] [<ffffffff810d5297>] ___might_sleep+0xa7/0x230
>> [ 70.016472] [<ffffffff810d5469>] __might_sleep+0x49/0x80
>> [ 70.016481] [<ffffffff811e54ce>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2fe/0xb90
>> [ 70.016490] [<ffffffff8112197d>] ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled+0x1d/0x20
>> [ 70.016499] [<ffffffff81024ab9>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
>> [ 70.016507] [<ffffffff810e24ac>] ? local_clock+0x1c/0x20
>> [ 70.016514] [<ffffffff8112197d>] ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled+0x1d/0x20
>> [ 70.016524] [<ffffffff810218e6>] dma_generic_alloc_coherent+0x96/0x130
>> [ 70.016534] [<ffffffff81069865>] x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent+0x25/0x50
>> [ 70.016541] [<ffffffff810215fd>] dma_alloc_attrs+0x6d/0xe0
>> [ 70.016555] [<ffffffffa003525e>] rtl8169_map_counters+0x3e/0x70 [r8169]
>
> ...rtl8169_map_counters only exists before Francois patch. The patch
> removes this function.
>
>
> Corinna
>
I do not know, is this OK?
$ rpm -i
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/kernel/4.3.0/0.rc0.git7.1.fc24/src/kernel-4.3.0-0.rc0.git7.1.fc24.src.rpm
$ rpmbuild -bp rpmbuild/SPECS/kernel.spec
$ cd rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-4.2.fc24/linux-4.3.0-0.rc0.git7.1.fc24.x86_64/
$ curl -s "http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=144145559429943&q=raw"; | patch -p1
patching file drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line
$ curl -s "http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=144145559729944&q=raw"; | patch -p1
patching file drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line
$ curl -s "http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=144145558929942&q=raw"; | patch -p1
patching file drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line
$ sed -i 's/PATCHLEVEL = 2/PATCHLEVEL = 3/' Makefile
$ sed -i 's/EXTRAVERSION =/EXTRAVERSION = -0.rc0.git7.1.fc24.x86_64/' Makefile
$ make -j drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.ko
$ su
# cp drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.ko
/usr/lib/modules/4.3.0-0.rc0.git7.1.fc24.x86_64/updates/
# depmod
# dracut -f --kver 4.3.0-0.rc0.git7.1.fc24.x86_64
# lsinitrd --kver 4.3.0-0.rc0.git7.1.fc24.x86_64 | grep r8169
... usr/lib/modules/4.3.0-0.rc0.git7.1.fc24.x86_64/updates/r8169.ko
# systemctl reboot
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
