On 08/27/2015 04:26 AM, Xin Long wrote: > in sctp_process_asconf(), we get address parameter from the beginning of > the addip params. but we never check if it's really there. if the addr > param is not there, it still can pass sctp_verify_asconf(), then to be > handled by sctp_process_asconf(), it will not be safe. > > so add a code in sctp_verify_asconf() to check the address parameter is in > the beginning, or return false to send abort. > > note that this can also detect multiple address parameters, and reject it. > > Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien....@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleit...@redhat.com>
Looks good to me. Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasev...@gmail.com> -vlad > --- > net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c > index 06320c8..a655ddc 100644 > --- a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c > +++ b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c > @@ -3132,11 +3132,18 @@ bool sctp_verify_asconf(const struct sctp_association > *asoc, > case SCTP_PARAM_IPV4_ADDRESS: > if (length != sizeof(sctp_ipv4addr_param_t)) > return false; > + /* ensure there is only one addr param and it's in the > + * beginning of addip_hdr params, or we reject it. > + */ > + if (param.v != addip->addip_hdr.params) > + return false; > addr_param_seen = true; > break; > case SCTP_PARAM_IPV6_ADDRESS: > if (length != sizeof(sctp_ipv6addr_param_t)) > return false; > + if (param.v != addip->addip_hdr.params) > + return false; > addr_param_seen = true; > break; > case SCTP_PARAM_ADD_IP: > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html