Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 09:51:52AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote: >On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >> Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 08:23:13AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote: >>>On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >>>> Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 07:43:18PM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >>>>>> From: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> > >>>>>We're going to run out of priv_flags bits. This flag doesn't seem >>>>>like something that will be checked lots of places. How about using >>>>>rtnl_link_ops->kind to save a bit in priv_flags? >>>>> >>>>>static inline bool netif_is_ovs_master(const struct net_device *dev) >>>>>{ >>>>> return !strcmp(dev->rtnl_link_ops->kind, "openvswitch")); >>>>>} >>>> >>>> There are lot of helpers like this for other soft-devices. I think that >>>> is okay to have it this way. The thing is that sometimes you need to use >>>> thi helper in fast path and in that case, you do not want to strcmp. >>>> >>>> There is plenty of priv_flags bits for now when I killed the bonding >>>> stuff. >>> >>>Ya, but think about the bit: you (and others) used a bit in priv_flags >>>to indicate the netdev type. Can you add an enum field to >>>rtnl_link_ops->type to indicate link type? Then it's not a strcmp. >>>You can write your helper using strcmp first, and then later migrate >>>to using rtnl_link_ops->type. >> >> >> Also, dev can be multiple things, it can be bridge port and vlan dev at >> the same time. Flags are good for this. > >priv_flags bits are three types: > >1) dev attribute (IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE, IFF_DISABLE_NETPOLL, etc) >2) dev type (IFF_802_1Q_VLAN, IFF_EBRIDGE, etc) >3) and dev membership (IFF_BRIDGE_PORT, IFF_TEAM_PORT, etc) > >Are there types 2 or 3 in any fast paths? Type 2 can move to enum; >they're mutually exclusive. Type 3 is the dev's master's type 2, and >since dev can have only one master, no flag is needed: just look up >master type to know if dev is bridged or ovs'ed.
3 is certainly used in fast-path. This priv_flags stuff could certainly get better somehow. I don't think that using rtnl_link_ops is the answer here. It is certainly out of scope of this patchset. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html