Hi, Thanks to my first RFC proposal to cap a netlink message in case of an error, i have rebased my work on Pablo Neira Ayuso. After some few trials, it appears to me in_skb->sk is not the correct socket to deal with.
Here comes a reworked and tested version based on Pablo's one. Also i believe it could be good to make it reach stable as it is somehow a bug fix. What do you think ? Best Regards Christophe Christophe Ricard (1): netlink: add NETLINK_CAP_ACK socket option include/uapi/linux/netlink.h | 1 + net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) -- 2.1.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
