From: David Ahern <d...@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:58:59 -0600

> In the context of internet scale routing a requirement that always comes
> up is the need to partition the available routing tables into disjoint
> routing planes. A specific use case is the multi-tenancy problem where
> each tenant has their own unique routing tables and in the very least
> need different default gateways.
> 
> This patch allows the ability to create virtual router domains (aka VRFs
> (VRF-lite to be specific) in the linux packet forwarding stack. The main
> observation is that through the use of rules and socket binding to interfaces,
> all the facilities that we need are already present in the infrastructure. 
> What
> is missing is a handle that identifies a routing domain and can be used to
> gather applicable rules/tables and uniqify neighbor selection. The scheme used
> needs to preserves the notions of ECMP, and general routing principles.

Series applied, however...

I don't think the ipv6 dependency should be there until you actually add
ipv6 support to VRF-Lite.

Furthermore, when you do, you need to make it so that people can enable
VRF even if they don't turn ipv6 on.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to