On 11/08/15 22:45, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
From: Roopa Prabhu <ro...@cumulusnetworks.com>
moves mpls_route nexthop fields to a new mpls_nhlfe
struct. mpls_nhlfe represents a mpls nexthop label forwarding entry.
It prepares mpls route structure for multipath support.
In the process moves mpls_route structure into internal.h.
Is there a requirement for moving this and the new datastructures into
internal.h? I may have missed it, but I don't see any dependency on this
in this patch series.
Moves some of the code from mpls_route_add into a separate mpls
nhlfe build function. changed mpls_rt_alloc to take number of
nexthops as argument.
A mpls route can point to multiple mpls_nhlfe. This patch
does not support multipath yet, hence the rest of the changes
assume that a mpls route points to a single mpls_nhlfe
Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <ro...@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
net/mpls/af_mpls.c | 225 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
net/mpls/internal.h | 35 ++++++++
2 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
index 8c5707d..cf86e9d 100644
--- a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
+++ b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
@@ -21,35 +21,6 @@
#endif
#include "internal.h"
-#define LABEL_NOT_SPECIFIED (1<<20)
-#define MAX_NEW_LABELS 2
-
-/* This maximum ha length copied from the definition of struct neighbour */
-#define MAX_VIA_ALEN (ALIGN(MAX_ADDR_LEN, sizeof(unsigned long)))
-
-enum mpls_payload_type {
- MPT_UNSPEC, /* IPv4 or IPv6 */
- MPT_IPV4 = 4,
- MPT_IPV6 = 6,
-
- /* Other types not implemented:
- * - Pseudo-wire with or without control word (RFC4385)
- * - GAL (RFC5586)
- */
-};
-
-struct mpls_route { /* next hop label forwarding entry */
- struct net_device __rcu *rt_dev;
- struct rcu_head rt_rcu;
- u32 rt_label[MAX_NEW_LABELS];
- u8 rt_protocol; /* routing protocol that set this
entry */
- u8 rt_payload_type;
- u8 rt_labels;
- u8 rt_via_alen;
- u8 rt_via_table;
- u8 rt_via[0];
-};
-
static int zero = 0;
static int label_limit = (1 << 20) - 1;
...
@@ -281,13 +254,15 @@ struct mpls_route_config {
struct nl_info rc_nlinfo;
};
-static struct mpls_route *mpls_rt_alloc(size_t alen)
+static struct mpls_route *mpls_rt_alloc(int num_nh)
{
struct mpls_route *rt;
- rt = kzalloc(sizeof(*rt) + alen, GFP_KERNEL);
+ rt = kzalloc(sizeof(*rt) + (num_nh * sizeof(struct mpls_nhlfe)),
How about this instead:
offsetof(typeof(*rt), rt_nh[num_nh])
?
That way, you don't need to write out the type of rt_nh here.
+ GFP_KERNEL);
if (rt)
- rt->rt_via_alen = alen;
+ rt->rt_nhn = num_nh;
+
return rt;
}
@@ -322,7 +297,7 @@ static void mpls_route_update(struct net *net, unsigned
index,
platform_label = rtnl_dereference(net->mpls.platform_label);
rt = rtnl_dereference(platform_label[index]);
- if (!dev || (rt && (rtnl_dereference(rt->rt_dev) == dev))) {
+ if (!dev || (rt && (rtnl_dereference(rt->rt_nh->nh_dev) == dev))) {
rcu_assign_pointer(platform_label[index], new);
old = rt;
}
@@ -406,23 +381,23 @@ static struct net_device *inet6_fib_lookup_dev(struct net
*net, void *addr)
#endif
static struct net_device *find_outdev(struct net *net,
- struct mpls_route_config *cfg)
+ struct mpls_nhlfe *nhlfe, int oif)
{
struct net_device *dev = NULL;
- if (!cfg->rc_ifindex) {
- switch (cfg->rc_via_table) {
+ if (!oif) {
+ switch (nhlfe->nh_via_table) {
case NEIGH_ARP_TABLE:
- dev = inet_fib_lookup_dev(net, cfg->rc_via);
+ dev = inet_fib_lookup_dev(net, nhlfe->nh_via);
break;
case NEIGH_ND_TABLE:
- dev = inet6_fib_lookup_dev(net, cfg->rc_via);
+ dev = inet6_fib_lookup_dev(net, nhlfe->nh_via);
break;
case NEIGH_LINK_TABLE:
break;
}
} else {
- dev = dev_get_by_index(net, cfg->rc_ifindex);
+ dev = dev_get_by_index(net, oif);
}
if (!dev)
@@ -431,15 +406,81 @@ static struct net_device *find_outdev(struct net *net,
return dev;
}
+int mpls_nhlfe_assign_dev(struct net *net, struct mpls_nhlfe *nhlfe, int oif)
+{
+ struct net_device *dev = NULL;
+ int err = -ENODEV;
+
+ dev = find_outdev(net, nhlfe, oif);
+ if (IS_ERR(dev)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(dev);
+ dev = NULL;
+ goto errout;
+ }
+
+ /* Ensure this is a supported device */
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ if (!mpls_dev_get(dev))
+ goto errout;
+
+ /* For now just support ethernet devices */
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ if ((dev->type != ARPHRD_ETHER) && (dev->type != ARPHRD_LOOPBACK))
+ goto errout;
Isn't this interface type check redundant with the mpls_dev_get call
just above?
+
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(nhlfe->nh_dev, dev);
+ dev_put(dev);
Is it safe to release the reference to dev here? Prior to these changes,
it was released after mpls_route_update is called in mpls_route_add - is
that OK without a reference?
+
+ return 0;
+
+errout:
+ if (dev)
+ dev_put(dev);
+ return err;
+}
+
+static int mpls_nhlfe_build(struct mpls_route_config *cfg,
+ struct mpls_nhlfe *nhlfe)
+{
+ struct net *net = cfg->rc_nlinfo.nl_net;
+ int err = -ENOMEM;
+ int i;
+
+ if (!nhlfe)
+ goto errout;
+
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ /* Ensure only a supported number of labels are present */
+ if (cfg->rc_output_labels > MAX_NEW_LABELS)
+ goto errout;
+
+ nhlfe->nh_labels = cfg->rc_output_labels;
+ for (i = 0; i < nhlfe->nh_labels; i++)
+ nhlfe->nh_label[i] = cfg->rc_output_label[i];
+
+ nhlfe->nh_payload_type = cfg->rc_payload_type;
+ nhlfe->nh_via_table = cfg->rc_via_table;
+ memcpy(nhlfe->nh_via, cfg->rc_via, cfg->rc_via_alen);
+ nhlfe->nh_via_alen = cfg->rc_via_alen;
Shouldn't this check that was removed from mpls_route_add be added here:
- if ((cfg->rc_via_table == NEIGH_LINK_TABLE) &&
- (dev->addr_len != cfg->rc_via_alen))
- goto errout;
?
+
+ err = mpls_nhlfe_assign_dev(net, nhlfe, cfg->rc_ifindex);
+ if (err)
+ goto errout;
+
+ return 0;
+
+errout:
+ return err;
+}
+
static int mpls_route_add(struct mpls_route_config *cfg)
{
struct mpls_route __rcu **platform_label;
struct net *net = cfg->rc_nlinfo.nl_net;
- struct net_device *dev = NULL;
struct mpls_route *rt, *old;
- unsigned index;
- int i;
int err = -EINVAL;
+ unsigned index;
+ int nhs = 1; /* default to one nexthop */
index = cfg->rc_label;
@@ -457,27 +498,6 @@ static int mpls_route_add(struct mpls_route_config *cfg)
if (index >= net->mpls.platform_labels)
goto errout;
- /* Ensure only a supported number of labels are present */
- if (cfg->rc_output_labels > MAX_NEW_LABELS)
- goto errout;
-
- dev = find_outdev(net, cfg);
- if (IS_ERR(dev)) {
- err = PTR_ERR(dev);
- dev = NULL;
- goto errout;
- }
-
- /* Ensure this is a supported device */
- err = -EINVAL;
- if (!mpls_dev_get(dev))
- goto errout;
-
- err = -EINVAL;
- if ((cfg->rc_via_table == NEIGH_LINK_TABLE) &&
- (dev->addr_len != cfg->rc_via_alen))
- goto errout;
-
/* Append makes no sense with mpls */
err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (cfg->rc_nlflags & NLM_F_APPEND)
...
diff --git a/net/mpls/internal.h b/net/mpls/internal.h
index 2681a4b..f05e2e8 100644
--- a/net/mpls/internal.h
+++ b/net/mpls/internal.h
...
@@ -21,6 +32,30 @@ struct mpls_dev {
struct sk_buff;
+#define LABEL_NOT_SPECIFIED (1 << 20)
+#define MAX_NEW_LABELS 2
+
+/* This maximum ha length copied from the definition of struct neighbour */
+#define MAX_VIA_ALEN (ALIGN(MAX_ADDR_LEN, sizeof(unsigned long)))
+
+struct mpls_nhlfe { /* next hop label forwarding entry */
Can we just call this mpls_nh? IMHO, NHLFE is a bit of MPLS-specific
jargon that doesn't really add anything and may impact readability for
anybody familiar with other protocols, but not with the MPLS RFCs.
+ struct net_device __rcu *nh_dev;
+ u32 nh_label[MAX_NEW_LABELS];
+ unsigned int nh_flags;
Is it worth adding the nh_flags field? Unless I missed something it
isn't used in this patch and isn't written in any subsequent patches.
+ u8 nh_payload_type;
nh_payload_type isn't really an attribute of the nexthop, but of the
route - it's signally the type of traffic that is using that route.
+ u8 nh_labels;
+ u8 nh_via_alen;
+ u8 nh_via_table;
+ u8 nh_via[MAX_VIA_ALEN];
MAX_VIA_ALEN is 32 bytes, so there is now a 28 byte overhead per nexthop
for the common case of using an IPv4 nexthop. With a large number of
routes/nexthops, this will become noticeable. If we avoided using a
fixed allocation, it would mitigate this.
+};
+
+struct mpls_route { /* next hop label forwarding entry */
Is it still the NHLFE? :-)
+ struct rcu_head rt_rcu;
+ u8 rt_protocol;
+ int rt_nhn;
+ struct mpls_nhlfe rt_nh[0];
+};
+
static inline struct mpls_shim_hdr *mpls_hdr(const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
return (struct mpls_shim_hdr *)skb_network_header(skb);
Thanks,
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
