From: David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com> > Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:18:42 -0400 (EDT) > >> On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:07 PM, David da...@davemloft.net wrote: >> >>> From: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com> >>> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:35 -0700 >>> >>>> Put differently, my question is how do you value not rewriting >>>> history vs. breaking bisectability (by accident of course)? >>> >>> I never will rewrite history, ever. >>> >>> Too many people clone my tree and depend upon it. >> >> Sorry, I still don't understand. What are the consequences of: >> >> git revert -m 1 f1d5ca4 >> >> Then applying v3? > > In this scenerio I think a relative fixup works better. > >> You already did that in the past: >> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/1f2cd84 > > Each and every situation is evaluated by me on a case by case > basis. Ok, if you guys really want me to I'll do the revert-reapply thing. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
