On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 10:56:38AM +0300, Matan Barak wrote: > Indeed this design flaw was introduced when the first legacy verb was > extended. I think that falling back from extended code to legacy code > should be in the uverbs code. ib_uverbs_write will return -ENOSYS only > if both extended and non-extended don't exist. The uverbs command itself > will call the non-extended form if the comp_mask is zero and all > data between legacy size and the given size are zero as well. > What do you think?
Yes, that is what I had expected from day 1.. Didn't notice it in the first introduction. Thanks, Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
