δΊ 2015/8/5 1:55, Alexei Starovoitov ει: > On 8/4/15 1:58 AM, Kaixu Xia wrote: >> +static int check_func_limit(struct bpf_map **mapp, int func_id) > > how about 'check_map_func_compatibility' or 'check_map_func_affinity' ? > >> +{ >> + struct bpf_map *map = *mapp; > > why pass pointer to a pointer? single pointer would be be fine. > >> + bool bool_map, bool_func; >> + int i; >> + >> + if (!map) >> + return 0; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i <= ARRAY_SIZE(func_limit); i++) { >> + bool_map = (map->map_type == func_limit[i].map_type); >> + bool_func = (func_id == func_limit[i].func_id); >> + /* only when map & func pair match it can continue. >> + * don't allow any other map type to be passed into >> + * the special func; >> + */ >> + if (bool_map != bool_func) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } > > nice simplification! > > the rest of the changes look good. > please respin your next set against net-next.
Thanks for your review! I will follow them in the next set. > > > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html