Hi David, On Aug 4, 2015, at 1:21 AM, David da...@davemloft.net wrote:
> From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com> > Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 21:46:02 -0400 > >> If the underlying network device features NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX, >> an EDSA frame is prepended with a 802.1q header once queued. >> >> To fix this, push the VLAN tag to the payload if present, before >> checking the frame protocol. >> >> [note: we may prefer to access directly VLAN TCI from hwaccel frames, >> but this approach is simpler.] >> >> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com> > > This is a bug fix so should target 'net', but you generated the patch > against 'net-next'. > > In any event, you should be explicit about the tree you are targetting > in order to not waste my time like this, by simply specifying the > tree in your "[PATCH xxx]" text in your subject line. Either > "[PATCH net]" or "[PATCH net-next]". Dully noted. Should I resend it? Thanks, -v -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
