> -----Original Message----- > From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:a...@arndb.de] > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 11:02 AM > To: linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Manoil Claudiu- > B08782; Wood Scott-B07421 > Subject: Re: [PATCH] gianfar: Fix warnings when built on 64-bit > > On Wednesday 29 July 2015 00:24:37 Scott Wood wrote: > > > Alternatively, if there's a desire to not mess with this code (I don't > > know how to trigger this code path to test it), this driver should be > > given dependencies that ensure that it only builds on 32-bit. > > These are obvious fixes, they should definitely go in.
This patch conflicts with the rx s/g patch series: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=9061cb023567abf081569d6851b0815dd18437e6 So if applied as it is on top of net.git it will give a headache when net-next.git will be merged into net.git (or vice versa). Since there are no 64-bit systems with gianfar/ eTSEC, I think that this patch should target net-next.git (reworked to be applicable on net-next.git) to avoid the conflict. I could do this rework and resend it on top of net-next.git > > > drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c > > index ff87502..7c682ac 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c > > @@ -565,6 +565,7 @@ static void gfar_ints_enable(struct gfar_private > *priv) > > } > > } > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM > > static void lock_tx_qs(struct gfar_private *priv) > > { > > int i; > > @@ -580,6 +581,7 @@ static void unlock_tx_qs(struct gfar_private *priv) > > for (i = 0; i < priv->num_tx_queues; i++) > > spin_unlock(&priv->tx_queue[i]->txlock); > > } > > +#endif > > > > This seems unrelated and should probably be a separate fix. > I'm working at a patch set to revive/ cleanup the power management code, and lock_tx_qs() is planned to be removed (it can be shown that it's not needed). So this change can be remove from this patch. Thanks, Claudiu [...] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html