Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> It is a prep work for the next patch to remove write_lock
> from rt6_probe().
> 
> 1. Reduce the number of if(neigh) check.  From 4 to 1.
> 2. Bring the write_(un)lock() closer to the operations that the
>    lock is protecting.
> 
> Hopefully, the above make rt6_probe() more readable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <ka...@fb.com>
> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <han...@stressinduktion.org>
> Cc: Julian Anastasov <j...@ssi.bg>
> Cc: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <hideaki.yoshif...@miraclelinux.com>

Acked-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <hideaki.yoshif...@miraclelinux.com>

--yoshfuji

> ---
>  net/ipv6/route.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index 7f2214f..6d503db 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -545,6 +545,7 @@ static void rt6_probe_deferred(struct work_struct *w)
>  
>  static void rt6_probe(struct rt6_info *rt)
>  {
> +     struct __rt6_probe_work *work;
>       struct neighbour *neigh;
>       /*
>        * Okay, this does not seem to be appropriate
> @@ -559,34 +560,29 @@ static void rt6_probe(struct rt6_info *rt)
>       rcu_read_lock_bh();
>       neigh = __ipv6_neigh_lookup_noref(rt->dst.dev, &rt->rt6i_gateway);
>       if (neigh) {
> +             work = NULL;
>               write_lock(&neigh->lock);
> -             if (neigh->nud_state & NUD_VALID)
> -                     goto out;
> -     }
> -
> -     if (!neigh ||
> -         time_after(jiffies, neigh->updated + 
> rt->rt6i_idev->cnf.rtr_probe_interval)) {
> -             struct __rt6_probe_work *work;
> -
> -             work = kmalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_ATOMIC);
> -
> -             if (neigh && work)
> -                     __neigh_set_probe_once(neigh);
> -
> -             if (neigh)
> -                     write_unlock(&neigh->lock);
> -
> -             if (work) {
> -                     INIT_WORK(&work->work, rt6_probe_deferred);
> -                     work->target = rt->rt6i_gateway;
> -                     dev_hold(rt->dst.dev);
> -                     work->dev = rt->dst.dev;
> -                     schedule_work(&work->work);
> +             if (!(neigh->nud_state & NUD_VALID) &&
> +                 time_after(jiffies,
> +                            neigh->updated +
> +                            rt->rt6i_idev->cnf.rtr_probe_interval)) {
> +                     work = kmalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_ATOMIC);
> +                     if (work)
> +                             __neigh_set_probe_once(neigh);
>               }
> -     } else {
> -out:
>               write_unlock(&neigh->lock);
> +     } else {
> +             work = kmalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_ATOMIC);
> +     }
> +
> +     if (work) {
> +             INIT_WORK(&work->work, rt6_probe_deferred);
> +             work->target = rt->rt6i_gateway;
> +             dev_hold(rt->dst.dev);
> +             work->dev = rt->dst.dev;
> +             schedule_work(&work->work);
>       }
> +
>       rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>  }
>  #else
> 

-- 
吉藤英明 <hideaki.yoshif...@miraclelinux.com>
ミラクル・リナックス株式会社 技術本部 サポート部
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to