Similar check was added in ip_rcv but not in ipv6_rcv.
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
IP: [<ffffffff81734e0a>] ipv6_rcv+0xfa/0x500
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff816c9786>] ? ip_rcv+0x296/0x400
[<ffffffff817732d2>] ? packet_rcv+0x52/0x410
[<ffffffff8168e99f>] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x63f/0x9a0
[<ffffffffc02b34a0>] ? br_handle_frame_finish+0x580/0x580 [bridge]
[<ffffffff8109912c>] ? update_rq_clock.part.81+0x1c/0x40
[<ffffffff8168ed18>] __netif_receive_skb+0x18/0x60
[<ffffffff8168fa1f>] process_backlog+0x9f/0x150
Fixes: ee122c79d422 (vxlan: Flow based tunneling)
Signed-off-by: Wei-Chun Chao <weich...@plumgrid.com>
---
net/ipv6/ip6_input.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c
index 57990c9..adba03a 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
#include <net/addrconf.h>
#include <net/xfrm.h>
#include <net/inet_ecn.h>
+#include <net/dst_metadata.h>
int ip6_rcv_finish(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
@@ -55,7 +56,7 @@ int ip6_rcv_finish(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (ipprot && ipprot->early_demux)
ipprot->early_demux(skb);
}
- if (!skb_dst(skb))
+ if (!skb_valid_dst(skb))
ip6_route_input(skb);
return dst_input(skb);
@@ -98,7 +99,7 @@ int ipv6_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
struct packet_type *pt
* arrived via the sending interface (ethX), because of the
* nature of scoping architecture. --yoshfuji
*/
- IP6CB(skb)->iif = skb_dst(skb) ?
ip6_dst_idev(skb_dst(skb))->dev->ifindex : dev->ifindex;
+ IP6CB(skb)->iif = skb_valid_dst(skb) ?
ip6_dst_idev(skb_dst(skb))->dev->ifindex : dev->ifindex;
if (unlikely(!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(*hdr))))
goto err;
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
