On 7/22/15, 5:23 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
On 07/22/15 at 12:10am, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
From: Roopa Prabhu <ro...@cumulusnetworks.com>
seen with CONFIG_IPV6 disabled. Wrap the code
around IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <ro...@cumulusnetworks.com>
We need the same for CONFIG_INET=n in inet_fib_lookup_dev:
/home/tgraf/dev/linux/net-next/include/net/route.h:122: undefined reference to
`ip_route_output_flow'
I will fix it.
Is it worth returning EAFNOSUPPORT instead of ENODEV in these
cases? Something like this:
sure, I am ok with changing it to return EAFNOSUPPORT.
I decided on -ENODEV because I was already sending -ENODEV
for cases where the dev cannot be resolved.
}
+#else
+static struct net_device *inet6_fib_lookup_dev(struct net *net, void *addr)
+{
+ return ERR_PTR(-EAFNOSUPPORT);
+}
+#endif
And then IS_ERR() in mpls_route_add()?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
