On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 03:42:34PM +0300, Haggai Eran wrote:
>               spin_lock_irq(&cm.lock);
> +             if (--cm_id_priv->listen_sharecount > 0) {
> +                     /* The id is still shared. */
> +                     atomic_dec(&cm_id_priv->refcount);

Nit: This looks very strange not to be cm_deref_id .. Looks OK as is
because we are sure refcount cannot be 0 here?

> @@ -958,8 +988,10 @@ int ib_cm_listen(struct ib_cm_id *cm_id, __be64 
> service_id, __be64 service_mask,
>       }
>  
>       cm_id->state = IB_CM_LISTEN;
> +     ++cm_id_priv->listen_sharecount;
>
> -     spin_lock_irqsave(&cm.lock, flags);
> +     if (lock)
> +             spin_lock_irqsave(&cm.lock, flags);

Hmm, I'd like to see the listen_sharecount consistently locked, so it
should be manipulated only while cm.lock is held..

>       if (service_id == IB_CM_ASSIGN_SERVICE_ID) {
>               cm_id->service_id = cpu_to_be64(cm.listen_service_id++);
>               cm_id->service_mask = ~cpu_to_be64(0);
> @@ -968,18 +1000,98 @@ int ib_cm_listen(struct ib_cm_id *cm_id, __be64 
> service_id, __be64 service_mask,
>               cm_id->service_mask = service_mask;
>       }
>       cur_cm_id_priv = cm_insert_listen(cm_id_priv);
> -     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cm.lock, flags);
> +     if (lock)
> +             spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cm.lock, flags);
>  
>       if (cur_cm_id_priv) {
>               cm_id->state = IB_CM_IDLE;
> +             --cm_id_priv->listen_sharecount;

Ditto

Otherwise I don't see any other mechanical problems with this. Sean
said he was happy with the idea right?

Reviewed-By: Jason Gunthorpe <jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com>

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to