From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlas...@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 20:48:55 +0200
> As its first order of business, boomerang_interrupt() checks whether > the device really has any pending interrupts. If it does not, > it does nothing and returns, but it still returns IRQ_HANDLED. > > This is wrong: interrupt was not handled, IRQ handlers of other > devices sharing this IRQ line need to be called. > > vortex_interrupt() has it right: it returns IRQ_NONE in this case > via IRQ_RETVAL(0). > > Do the same in boomerang_interrupt(). > > Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlas...@redhat.com> Looks good, applied, thanks Denys. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
