On 7/6/15, 6:03 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
The integration into the routing code looks much better now. Any
chance you can rebase your tree and squash it into logical
commits?
Will do today.
I'm rebasing again onto yours and I think we should submit
all of this in a single series so everything can be reviewed in a
single thread.
agreed.
All of this is only useful if distros enable this by default which
minimize the value of a config option quite a bit. I think what you
have your latest tree is a good balance.
ok
I have been thinking of moving lwtstate from rtable to struct dst_entry.
I will also look at the dst_metadata.
I thought about the same. The introduction of dst_metadata makes
that a bit pointless because we don't want to store a pointer to the
tunnel metadata but allocate the metadata as a dst directly to avoid
the indirection. We need the separate code paths anyway until v6 and
v4 routing are merged so we would save very little while penalizing
everyone except rtable and fib6.
agreed,
thanks,
Roopa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
