On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 11:14 PM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Alex Gartrell <agartr...@fb.com>
> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 13:13:09 -0700
>
>> If we early-demux bind a TCP_TIMEWAIT socket to an skb and then orphan it
>> (as we need to do in the ipvs forwarding case), sock_wfree and sock_rfree
>> are going to reach into the inet_timewait_sock and mess with fields that
>> don't exist.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Gartrell <agartr...@fb.com>
>
> If we're forwarding, we should not find a local socket, period.
>
> We should only match sockets for locally destined packets.
>
> So I'd say that the state in which you say this can occur is illegal.

Right, this patch is totally buggy.

A socket cannot change state to TCP_TIMEWAIT.

A new object is allocated and old one is removed from ehash, then
freed (rcu rules being applied)

Also sock_wfree() has nothing to do with early demux. It is for output
path skbs only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to