Hi David, On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 01:44 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Alexey Brodkin <alexey.brod...@synopsys.com> > Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 11:07:26 +0300 > > > > > - priv->dma_tx = dma_alloc_coherent(priv->device, > > txsize * > > + priv->dma_tx = dma_zalloc_coherent(priv->device, > > txsize * > > sizeof(struct > > dma_desc), > > &priv > > ->dma_tx_phy, > > GFP_KERNEL); > > When you change the column at which the openning parenthesis of the > function call occurs, you must indent the subsequent lines of the > function call such that the all are adjusted to properly start > at the very next column after that openning parenthesis.' > > Please fix this up for all of the dma_zalloc_coherent() > transformations.
I thought about that and actually made this change initially but later reverted it because I noticed dma_free_coherent() had parameters not -aligned/idented properly. So do you think if I may fix identation of dma_free_coherent() while at it as well or I need to send a separate patch that takes care about dma_free_coherent() solely? -Alexey-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
