On 06/20/2015 10:14 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > I think it would be useful to perhaps have two options: > > 1) User specifies a specific CPU and gets one such an output above.
Good point. Will do. > 2) Summary view, i.e. to have the samples of each CPU for comparison > next to each other in columns and maybe the histogram view a bit > more compressed (perhaps summary of all CPUs). I agree, the current view is not really optimal. I'll look into this as well. Alexei indicated that he is working on per-cpu variables support. I think that would be extremely useful to drop the hard coded limit of CPUs and turning this sample code into some more generic code. > Anyway, it's sample code people can go with and modify individually. I am interested to turn this code into a more useful tool. Though I think I miss some background information why this code is kept as samples. Obviously, there is the API and ARCH dependency. As long as an API change can reliable be detected I don't see a real show stopper. Maybe I am too naive. Furthermore I expected that trace_preempt_[on|off] wont change that often. > Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net> Thanks, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
