From: roopa <ro...@cumulusnetworks.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:37:23 -0700
> On 6/17/15, 11:30 AM, Scott Feldman wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Roopa Prabhu >> <ro...@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: >>> From: Roopa Prabhu <ro...@cumulusnetworks.com> >>> >>> This patch adds NLM_F_APPEND flag to struct nlmsg_hdr->nlmsg_flags >>> in newroute notifications if the route add was an append. >>> (This is similar to how NLM_F_REPLACE is already part of new >>> route replace notifications today) >>> >>> This helps userspace determine if the route add operation was >>> an append. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <ro...@cumulusnetworks.com> >>> --- >>> v2: flip if condition around append and change |= to = >>> (feedback from Alexander Duyck and Scott Feldman) >> Is this a bug fix for net, or a new feature for net-next? Regardless, >> >> Acked-by: Scott Feldman <sfel...@gmail.com> > I could not decide between net and net-next. > ....but the patch applies cleanly against net if Dave decides to pick > it up for net. It's been like this for so long that it's more like a new feature. Therefore, applied to net-next, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
