On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:25:59 -0400
Trond Myklebust <trond.mykleb...@primarydata.com> wrote:


> 8<--------------------------------------------------------------
> >From 4876cc779ff525b9c2376d8076edf47815e71f2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Trond Myklebust <trond.mykleb...@primarydata.com>
> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:17:57 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH v2] SUNRPC: Ensure we release the TCP socket once it has been
>  closed
> 
> This fixes a regression introduced by commit caf4ccd4e88cf2 ("SUNRPC:
> Make xs_tcp_close() do a socket shutdown rather than a sock_release").
> Prior to that commit, the autoclose feature would ensure that an
> idle connection would result in the socket being both disconnected and
> released, whereas now only gets disconnected.
> 
> While the current behaviour is harmless, it does leave the port bound
> until either RPC traffic resumes or the RPC client is shut down.

Is there a way to test RPC traffic resuming? I'd like to try that before
declaring this bug harmless.

> 
> Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>

The problem appears to go away with this patch.

Tested-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>

Thanks a lot!

-- Steve

> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.mykleb...@primarydata.com>
> ---
>  net/sunrpc/xprt.c     |  2 +-
>  net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
> index 3ca31f20b97c..ab5dd621ae0c 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
> @@ -611,8 +611,8 @@ static void xprt_autoclose(struct work_struct *work)
>       struct rpc_xprt *xprt =
>               container_of(work, struct rpc_xprt, task_cleanup);
>  
> -     xprt->ops->close(xprt);
>       clear_bit(XPRT_CLOSE_WAIT, &xprt->state);
> +     xprt->ops->close(xprt);
>       xprt_release_write(xprt, NULL);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> index fda8ec8c74c0..ee0715dfc3c7 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> @@ -623,24 +623,6 @@ process_status:
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * xs_tcp_shutdown - gracefully shut down a TCP socket
> - * @xprt: transport
> - *
> - * Initiates a graceful shutdown of the TCP socket by calling the
> - * equivalent of shutdown(SHUT_RDWR);
> - */
> -static void xs_tcp_shutdown(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> -{
> -     struct sock_xprt *transport = container_of(xprt, struct sock_xprt, 
> xprt);
> -     struct socket *sock = transport->sock;
> -
> -     if (sock != NULL) {
> -             kernel_sock_shutdown(sock, SHUT_RDWR);
> -             trace_rpc_socket_shutdown(xprt, sock);
> -     }
> -}
> -
> -/**
>   * xs_tcp_send_request - write an RPC request to a TCP socket
>   * @task: address of RPC task that manages the state of an RPC request
>   *
> @@ -786,6 +768,7 @@ static void xs_sock_mark_closed(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
>       xs_sock_reset_connection_flags(xprt);
>       /* Mark transport as closed and wake up all pending tasks */
>       xprt_disconnect_done(xprt);
> +     xprt_force_disconnect(xprt);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -2103,6 +2086,27 @@ out:
>       xprt_wake_pending_tasks(xprt, status);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * xs_tcp_shutdown - gracefully shut down a TCP socket
> + * @xprt: transport
> + *
> + * Initiates a graceful shutdown of the TCP socket by calling the
> + * equivalent of shutdown(SHUT_RDWR);
> + */
> +static void xs_tcp_shutdown(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> +{
> +     struct sock_xprt *transport = container_of(xprt, struct sock_xprt, 
> xprt);
> +     struct socket *sock = transport->sock;
> +
> +     if (sock == NULL)
> +             return;
> +     if (xprt_connected(xprt)) {
> +             kernel_sock_shutdown(sock, SHUT_RDWR);
> +             trace_rpc_socket_shutdown(xprt, sock);
> +     } else
> +             xs_reset_transport(transport);
> +}
> +
>  static int xs_tcp_finish_connecting(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct socket 
> *sock)
>  {
>       struct sock_xprt *transport = container_of(xprt, struct sock_xprt, 
> xprt);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in

Reply via email to