On 05/29/2015 09:50 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> I count 5 places of redundancy. 
> 

Another two places you found are necessary indeed!

Acked-by: Ying Xue <ying....@windriver.com>

> diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
> index 
> 3a74df750af4044eba0e7d88ae01ca9b4dac0e72..ac3b69183cc982e722d9683d6de7a39f66b50b64
>  100644
> --- a/net/core/neighbour.c
> +++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
> @@ -141,9 +141,7 @@ static int neigh_forced_gc(struct neigh_table *tbl)
>                       write_lock(&n->lock);
>                       if (atomic_read(&n->refcnt) == 1 &&
>                           !(n->nud_state & NUD_PERMANENT)) {
> -                             rcu_assign_pointer(*np,
> -                                     rcu_dereference_protected(n->next,
> -                                               lockdep_is_held(&tbl->lock)));
> +                             *np = n->next;
>                               n->dead = 1;
>                               shrunk  = 1;
>                               write_unlock(&n->lock);
> @@ -210,9 +208,7 @@ static void neigh_flush_dev(struct neigh_table *tbl, 
> struct net_device *dev)
>                               np = &n->next;
>                               continue;
>                       }
> -                     rcu_assign_pointer(*np,
> -                                rcu_dereference_protected(n->next,
> -                                             lockdep_is_held(&tbl->lock)));
> +                     *np = n->next;
>                       write_lock(&n->lock);
>                       neigh_del_timer(n);
>                       n->dead = 1;
> @@ -380,10 +376,8 @@ static struct neigh_hash_table *neigh_hash_grow(struct 
> neigh_table *tbl,
>                       next = rcu_dereference_protected(n->next,
>                                               lockdep_is_held(&tbl->lock));
>  
> -                     rcu_assign_pointer(n->next,
> -                                        rcu_dereference_protected(
> -                                             new_nht->hash_buckets[hash],
> -                                             lockdep_is_held(&tbl->lock)));
> +                     n->next = new_nht->hash_buckets[hash];
> +
>                       rcu_assign_pointer(new_nht->hash_buckets[hash], n);
>               }
>       }
> @@ -515,9 +509,7 @@ struct neighbour *__neigh_create(struct neigh_table *tbl, 
> const void *pkey,
>       n->dead = 0;
>       if (want_ref)
>               neigh_hold(n);
> -     rcu_assign_pointer(n->next,
> -                        
> rcu_dereference_protected(nht->hash_buckets[hash_val],
> -                                                  
> lockdep_is_held(&tbl->lock)));
> +     n->next = nht->hash_buckets[hash_val];
>       rcu_assign_pointer(nht->hash_buckets[hash_val], n);
>       write_unlock_bh(&tbl->lock);
>       neigh_dbg(2, "neigh %p is created\n", n);
> @@ -2381,9 +2373,7 @@ void __neigh_for_each_release(struct neigh_table *tbl,
>                       write_lock(&n->lock);
>                       release = cb(n);
>                       if (release) {
> -                             rcu_assign_pointer(*np,
> -                                     rcu_dereference_protected(n->next,
> -                                             lockdep_is_held(&tbl->lock)));
> +                             *np = n->next;
>                               n->dead = 1;
>                       } else
>                               np = &n->next;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to