On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Sorin Dumitru <so...@returnze.ro> wrote: > We're seeing some softlockups from this function when there > are a lot fdb entries on a vxlan device. Taking the lock for > each bucket instead of the whole table is enough to fix that. >
Hmm, then the spinlock could be moved into each bucket, right? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html