On 27/05/15 16:55, Rose, Gregory V wrote: > There's nothing to prevent any vendor from notifying a VF that it has > privileges and there's nothing that require that they do. This should be a > vendor specific detail. Agreed - purely a driver implementation detail. > So now that I've stated my preference let me also state that I do not want to > hold up acceptance of the Hiroshi's if_link patch that sets the > trusted/privileged state for the VF while we further discuss this driver > specific detail. Agreed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
- RE: [PATCH v5 3/3] ixgbe: Add new ndo to trust VF Hiroshi Shimamoto
- RE: [PATCH v5 3/3] ixgbe: Add new ndo to trust VF Skidmore, Donald C
- RE: [PATCH v5 3/3] ixgbe: Add new ndo to trust VF Rose, Gregory V
- RE: [PATCH v5 3/3] ixgbe: Add new ndo to trust VF Hiroshi Shimamoto
- RE: [PATCH v5 3/3] ixgbe: Add new ndo to trust VF Rose, Gregory V
- RE: [PATCH v5 3/3] ixgbe: Add new ndo to trust VF Skidmore, Donald C
- RE: [PATCH v5 3/3] ixgbe: Add new ndo to trust VF Rose, Gregory V
- Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] ixgbe: Add new ndo to trust VF Edward Cree
- RE: [PATCH v5 3/3] ixgbe: Add new ndo to trust VF Skidmore, Donald C
- RE: [PATCH v5 3/3] ixgbe: Add new ndo to trust VF Rose, Gregory V
- Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] ixgbe: Add new ndo to trust VF Edward Cree