From: Flavio Leitner <f...@sysclose.org> Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 10:24:14 -0300
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:50:21AM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: >> On Tue, 26 May 2015 15:03:56 -0700, Pravin Shelar wrote: >> > OVS interface for generic networking device operation looks odd. have >> > you considered adding new device ioctl to do this? >> >> New ioctls for networking configuration are generally not allowed. The >> preferred way to configure networking is netlink. And as this is very >> much ovs specific (all other users of dev_disable_lro such as bridging >> want to do this unconditionally), ovs netlink is the correct place to >> put this to. > > Exactly. Team, Bonding, bridge, and when you enable forwarding on a > networking device gets LRO automatically disabled in the kernel. > > I suggest to always disable LRO in the kernel as the other examples > do until there is a real need in OVS to benefit from LRO to implement > such API change. Agreed, just turn off LRO by default and don't add a new interface to turn it back on until we actually need it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html