From: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 10:45:34 +0800

> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 05:08:19PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> As far as I can tell, this ought to be fine as-is.
> 
> OK what about dropping the global rover altogether? Let's just
> start randomly like UDP.
> 
> ---8<---
> Currently we use a global rover to select a port ID that is unique.
> This used to work consistently when it was protected with a global
> lock.  However as we're now lockless, the global rover can exhibit
> pathological behaviour should multiple threads all stomp on it at
> the same time.
> 
> Granted this will eventually resolve itself but the process is
> suboptimal.
> 
> This patch replaces the global rover with a pseudorandom starting
> point to avoid this issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>

Yep, this is fine, applied.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to