From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varad...@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 15:29:08 -0400
> On (05/04/15 14:47), David Miller wrote: >> >> I think adding 64K of data to this module just to solve this rare >> issue is excessive. > > I'd based that number mostly as a heuristic based on rds_conn_hash[]. > Any suggestions for what's reasonable? 8K? Less? > (BTW, I think that should be 32K, or am I mis-counting?) No table at all. There has to be another way to notice this kind of situation, how for example does NFS or any other sunrpc using service handle this case? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
