On 17.04, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:13:25PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> >
> > So currently we have one fast path, that is: we are not fragmented, we
> > get out non-fragmented, none of this code is ever touched and no
> > problem.
> > 
> > We don't want to mak this more complex, but
> 
> You should read Dave's other email where he gives you an obvious
> solution.  If you have to modify the skb then you don't have to
> worry about the original fragments.
> 
> But if you only read the skb then don't linearise it completely
> and keep the original fragments.

Yes, I was just responding to that. We need an additional member
in the skb, but then this part is quite simple.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to