From: Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:05:42 +0100
> > On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 20:56 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 11:52 -0800, David Miller wrote: > > > From: Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:53:48 +0100 > > > > > > > Maybe we should just add a new printf modifier like %M for MAC > > > > addresses? Then we could use sprintf, snprintf, printk and whatever we > > > > please without any of the macro stuff... > > > > > > But GCC has no idea what the heck it is and will warn. > > > > No, I actually wondered about that too and finally just tried, it simply > > ignores it when doing the printf warnings. > > Wait, no, you're right, I had the wrong warning flags enabled :( Oh well :-/ I really think it's not worth dorking around with this print_mac() stuff so much like this, let's just take care of the cases that Patrick mentioned (which need to go back to MAC_FMT because they are in fast paths) and then leave this alone for a while. We've already wasted too much time on this. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
